Motor Salvage Operators Regulations Toolkit
Case study: Devon and Cornwall Case study: Devon and Cornwall
This case study outlines work done in Devon and Cornwall to implement and enforce the Motor Salvage Operators Regulations
It covers:
Structure
The local/unitary authorities in Devon and Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly
each organise their own register however, they have a single point of contact
within Devon and Cornwall Constabulary and a single process which has been
mapped out to assist the authorities and police to work together.
See the flow chart of the action process within the Devon and Cornwall area
To prevent a duplication of effort when the regulations were brought in, a
police representative from the Vehicle Crime Reduction and Investigation Support
unit worked with an authority representative from Exeter City Council to produce
application templates for use by every authority.
Show me Devon and Cornwall's application forms
Show me Devon and Cornwall's template letters
The registration process
Vehicle Investigation Officers within each of the four Basic Command Units within Devon and Cornwall Constabulary are the main source for MSO identification. These premises are then sent application packs by the local authority and encouraged to register to avoid prosecution for failing to register.
Liaison between police and local authorities
There is a Memorandum of Understanding between the police and local authorities which covers the responsibilities of each party, indemnity, data protection issues and nominated liaison contacts. Twelve out of sixteen authorities have signed this protocol and the local authority contacts have responded positively to a police suggestions for a force area or regional forum for practitioners to discuss current issues. Close liaison has been an important factor to implement the scheme once the correct person has been identified.
Enforcement
Although the police have a single point of contact, the decision to visit or enforce the legislation rests with Basic Command Units (BCUs) which have competing priorities for resources.
Proceedings to date include
A prosecution for failing to keep proper records which resulted in a £100 fine.
A rejection as a result of a police objection - although the applicant subsequently commenced appeal proceedings, they withdrew at the last minute.
The force has a database that is accessible to all officers for the identification of certificated premises. This is necessary to determine police powers when required. The system used allows staff to have access to the 'vehicle related' activity performed by IIMU and BCU VIO (vehicle investigation officers). This includes all activity on MSO Regulations which is recorded and auditable via the system.
Last update: 25 January 2005 |
Related Links |
||||
|
Last update: Related LinksLast update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: Last update: | ||||


