*

Crime Reduction Toolkits

Partnership Working

Crime - Let's bring it down
 
* *
*
* *

 
*
*
Toolkits Homepage
*
Toolkits Content
*
*
Introduction
*
What do we know
*
Local Solutions
*
Tackling The Problem
*
Making It Happen
*
Resources
*
Innovation
*
Practical Tools
*
Contact Points
*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*
*

Toolkit Index

Establish a Budget

Meeting the costs of the core team should be established at the scoping meeting but setting a budget for the full audit process should be deferred until all of the tasks and individuals to be involved in the auditing process have been determined. The process will have require estimated costs for:

  • Redirecting internal resources to work on the audit (these include staff time and IT equipment)

  • Purchasing external equipment (such as a GIS system for data analysis)

  • Services required for work on the audit or the putting out of a contract for tender (such as carrying out surveys, focus group sessions).

Quotes should be obtained in advance for items of equipment and services that the partnership is intending to purchase. It is vital that the cost of staff time is not underestimated; this is usually the largest source of expenditure, but is often under-costed.

A contingency fund should be provided for in the budget. Regardless of the accuracy of estimates of costs, unpredictable situations may arise during work on the audit i.e. an unexpectedly low response to a survey of local residents, necessitating its repetition.

On the basis of the costings and reserve, the overall operating budget for the audit can be calculated. The operating budget can be broken down on a month-by-month basis. This can be achieved through the project plan, which should indicate when tasks will be completed, and when specific services and individual staff's time will be utilised.

Actual expenditure against planned expenditure should be monitored and any significant discrepancies investigated. This may indicate departure from the overall plan for the audit.

Effective detailed planning should limit budget difficulties and the majority of financial problems that can occur are likely to revolve around slippage in time-scales. Slippage need not lead to problems if there are sufficient contingency funds. Priority should be given to completion of those tasks identified as having the potential to delay the whole project (see Critical Path Analysis). Delay in these areas may lead to an overspend in the budget even with a contingency fund.

Costs for ongoing auditing process should also be determined at an early stage to ensure that resources are available to identify and maintain the effectiveness and strategy implementation.

Back to Organisational Issues

<<Contents

 > Previous Section

> Next Section

 

*
   
** Back to Top    Site Help    Search    Contact Us    Site Map    Knowledgebase