
Simple Analysing of Patterns of Crime and Disorder
Incidents, victims and offenders - Offenders do not always commit crime
in their own neighbourhoods. Individuals are often victimised away from their homes.
Incidents can occur in locations where neither victims nor offenders live. it is helpful
to map patterns of, and relationships between incidents, victims and offenders. This
will make it easier to understand how crime patterns are produced and where interventions
are most likely to yield significant results. There will be varying incident, victim
and offender patterns according to area and crime type. Moreover, geographical patterns
of offending will not necessarily reflect pre-determined boundaries
Incidence, prevalence and concentration - Crime patterns can usefully be
decomposed into incidence, prevalence and concentration. Incidence describes the number
of incidents in a given area. prevalence describes the number of victims in a given
area. Concentration describes the average number of incidents per victim in a given
area. The three terms are clearly related: prevalence multiplied by concentration
gives us incidence. High levels of concentration (now very often found) suggest ways
of targeting resources on the most vulnerable, which is also likely to produce significant
reductions in overall crime rates.
Time, place and movement - Offences occur when likely offenders meet suitable
targets in a conducive environment without anyone else there effectively to defend
the victim, or dissuade the offender. Their patterning is, thus, a function of the
spatio-temporal distribution and movement of offenders, victims and those in a position
to stand between them. Prevention occurs through keeping likely offenders and victims
apart, allocating protection where and when it is most needed, making victims less
attractive to prospective offenders, or by lessening offender motivation or predisposition.
Analysis of incident patterns by reference to time, place and movement of victim and
offender will help partnerships decide what will have most purchase on problems, and
where, when, and in relation to whom it is most needed.
Households, persons and areas - Raw crime figures need to be converted to
standardised rates to compare levels of crime problem. Different offences require
differing denominators. Assaults may be looked at in terms of number per 1,000 individuals.
Domestic burglary can be measured in terms of number per 1,000 households. Commercial
burglary is better looked at in terms of number per 1,000 businesses (though identifying
the number of businesses in an area can be very difficult). Car crimes may be best
looked at in terms of number per hectare.
Signs, sights and measurements - 'Unobtrusive measures' may be useful in
analysing patterns of incivility and frequently unreported or unrecorded crime: heaps
of toughened glass can show where cars have been broken into; rates in infective hepatitis
can indicate amounts of drug use by injection; A&E visits for stabbings and 'falls'
can act as an indicator for violence; rates of replacement windows and doors in schools,
LA homes etc. can be an indicator of burglary and criminal damage; the location and
contents of rubbish bins will give an indication of drinking patterns etc. \moreover,
soft data - notably from beat officers with close contact with their area - can be
invaluable for filling out recorded crime data; they will often be sensitive to changes
in local communities and the nature and pattern of emerging problems.
Criminals, targets and crime methods - Knowing the attributes of high-rate
offenders and victims can help target preventative measures. In the case of offenders:
sex, age, address, family background, experience of care, offending careers, drug-taking
habits, crime method and whether mentally disordered are all important. in the case
of individual and household victims: sex, age, address, household composition, time
and place of incident, losses incurred and crime method can all be informative. In
the case of institutional/organisational victim: type of organisation or business
size, address, losses, time and place of incident, and crime method can all be useful.
These data need to be kept in standardised forms if informative aggregate crime and
disorder patterns are to be analysed.
Source: Auditing crime and disorder: guidance for local partnerships.
Crime Detection and prevention Series 91 Michael Hough & Nick Tilley. 1998
Full report: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/prgpdfs/fcdps91.pdf
Summary report: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/prgpdfs/cdp91bf.pdf
Click on the links below for more information
Using software to do analysis
Doing analysis
Describing categorical data: Frequencies & spreads
Moving beyond describing: Hypotheses & inferences
Cross-tabulations
Testing the significance of the data
Describing continuous data
Moving beyond describing with continuous data: Tests
Back to Data Analysis
|