|
Identifying costs of inputs |
|
Broad approach |
Specific approach |
What would it involve? |
Policy implications? |
Could be done by local partnership? |
|
Identifying costs of inputs |
1) Estimating direct costs for a mainstream service or project
based on national average costs |
Having identified personnel time devoted to a project or
particular element of a mainstream service, figures for the national
average cost of different types and grade of personnel would be used
to estimate direct costs |
Could be used for very basic policy appraisal such as the
identification of areas where the introduction of a crime reduction
measure could result in cost savings.
Could be included in mainstreaming / S17 review |
Yes – relatively easy |
|
2) Identification of actual direct and indirect costs for a
project |
Identification of direct and indirect costs for a project will be
easier than for mainstream services where only a part of the service
has a crime reduction outcome |
Could be used for very basic policy option appraisal such as
identifying how much specific projects are costing in order to
decide what projects and initiatives to include in a strategy.
Could contribute to a Best Value or S17 Review |
Yes – relatively easy |
|
3) Identification of actual direct costs for a mainstream service |
Identifying the ‘direct’ costs of a mainstream service’s
contribution to a crime and disorder reduction objective by
identifying staff time allocated to the objective and using direct
costs such as salaries and on-costs to cost input. |
Could be used as part of a Section 17 or Best Value review to
identify, in broad terms, the contributions of different departments
or services to crime reduction. |
Yes – relatively easy |
|
4) Identification of actual direct and indirect costs of a
mainstream service |
Follow process outlined in 3, but then go on to identify indirect
costs such as support services, accommodation etc.. In large
organisations these costs are likely to be held centrally and will
need to be disaggregated. |
Identifying the ‘true’ cost of crime prevention and the
different functions that go to make up the sum of crime prevention
in an area will allow for crime reduction to be seen as a system and
the priorities of the system to be identified. |
Yes – but difficult |