Neighbourhood Wardens
Neighbourhood Wardens Scheme Implementation Plan Guidance
Although this guidance refers to previous schemes, it remains good practice for reference purposes.
3. DEVELOPING A RESPONSE TO LOCAL PROBLEMS
3.1 Objectives
3.1.1 Fundamental to a successful scheme are tightly defined objectives, which relate to the problems in the target area, and clearly state what the scheme is designed to achieve. Objectives give a focus to the work of the scheme and help its progress to be monitored against known criteria. Problems identified through examination of the baseline data should therefore be prioritised to produce a limited number of key objectives based upon consideration of the level of need, local consultation, etc.
3.1.2 The overall aim of the scheme should be clearly articulated in Section 3.1, eg:
“to build community confidence by reducing crime and fear of crime, deterring anti-social behaviour, improving the physical appearance and management of the neighbourhood, and fostering social inclusion”.
3.1.3 Schemes will also need to set a restricted number of detailed objectives that describe the specific goals of the scheme (SIP Section 3.1). Schemes should set a mixture of short-term and longer-term objectives. Short term objectives, or “quick wins”, can play an important role in raising awareness of the scheme and fostering public support. These detailed objectives should relate to the overall purpose of the scheme, such as reductions in specific types of crime, increased feeling of security amongst residents, improved reporting of racial incidents and environmental improvements. Objectives may also be set for process issues, such as training of wardens to a specified standard, improving information sources, etc.
3.1.4 Objectives must not be set in stone. Schemes must be prepared to adapt to changing circumstances. The relevance of existing objectives, and the need for changes in the focus of the scheme, should be considered as part of the annual review process.
3.1.5 Objectives need to be translated into specific outcome targets. This process of target setting is considered in more detail in Section 5.4 of this guidance.
3.2 Option Appraisal
3.2.1 It is necessary to consider whether a neighbourhood warden scheme is the most appropriate method for achieving the desired outcome through a formal option appraisal process. Scheme managers should consider the possible options for obtaining the desired outcome and then decide which is the most appropriate option after taking into account economy, efficiency and effectiveness (following the principles of 'best value' laid out in the Local Government Act 1999). It is important to consider if any supporting measures need to be put in to place to ensure the success of the various options. Any additional benefits (or ‘spin offs’) of each option should also be considered.
3.2.2 The final choice of option(s) with which to proceed will be based upon a number of factors, with the preferred option being the one that:
produces a pattern of expected outcomes which fits closely with the desired or target outcomes;
-
benefits all sections of the community, including minority groups;
-
is cost effective and therefore offers value for money;
-
is most likely to produce beneficial outcomes that will be durable and sustainable;
-
complements other activity in the area; and
-
has the support of local agencies and residents.
3.2.3 Scheme managers should indicate in 3.2 of the SIP other options that were considered and the reasons why a neighbourhood warden scheme was selected as the most appropriate method for achieving the desired outcomes. Options should always be compared against the baseline of ‘doing nothing’.
Last update: 27/08/03